Return on Investment Dynamic Work Intervention

Return on Investment Dynamic Work Intervention

To assess the cost-effectiveness and return-on-investment (ROI) of the Dynamic Work (DW) Intervention, a worksite intervention aimed at reducing sitting time among office workers.

In total, 244 workers were randomized to the intervention or control group. Overall sitting time, standing time, step counts, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs were measured over 12 months. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the societal perspective and the ROI analysis from the employers’ perspective.

No significant differences in effects and societal costs were observed between groups. Presenteeism costs were significantly lower in the intervention group. The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 0.90 at a willingness-to-pay of 20,000&OV0556;/QALY. The probability of financial savings was 0.86.

The intervention may be considered cost-effective from the societal perspective depending on the willingness-to-pay. From the employer perspective, the intervention seems cost-beneficial.

Reference

Reference: Ben ÂJ, Jelsma JGM, Renaud LR, Huysmans MA, van Nassau F, van der Beek AJ, van der Ploeg HP, van Dongen JM, Bosmans JE. Cost-Effectiveness and Return-on-Investment of the Dynamic Work Intervention Compared With Usual Practice to Reduce Sedentary Behavior. J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jun 8.

About The Author

About The Author

Author Photo

Femke van Nassau is a senior researcher at the Amsterdam UMC, VUmc, specializing in human movement science. Her work at the Department of Public and Occupational Health and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute focuses on developing, implementing, and scaling up lifestyle interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior. With a PhD in scaling up school-based obesity prevention programs, she continues to lead innovative health promotion projects across various settings.

Recent Publications

Previous
Previous

Athlete health protection: Why qualitative research matters

Next
Next

5- and 10-year cost-effectiveness EuroFIT